I’m going to share my bodies report to me:
BURAK AĞBULUT’s JURY REPORT
In Burak’s design, his main strategy is using horizontal direction to the horizon. And also, he want to prevent wind and protect vista. In his case, there are 3 main spaces which are 2 big, 1 small part. He use small part to combine the other big parts. He also use topography and there are level differences. On the other hand he got some critics from juries. Juries criticised that his spaces look like building. They also said that design got better if roof was different or did not use on spaces. Because using roof is broke his strategy. In his design, there are slits which are coming from Cappadocia and according to juries, that was good point but it was not working in his condition. Moreover all interior conditions are not really working but there are relation between them. However, there is no exterior conditions. Also spatial relations are weak because all composition is related between intersecting 3 main spaces.
My oppinions and what I acquired;
My model is looking like a building, I guess I should break that. The Jury says the model is so enclosed and like a building but they say for this course we are working on experiences from human. The architectural elements are good in the model; there are walls, columns, opennings etc. I diverse the model with 3 different main spaces, the 3 different zones act differently; first ine is merges on the slope area, the socond one is actually work like a connection space and it doesn’t touch the ground and the third one is located on the flat area. Actually I tried to make a harmony betwythese spaces with scales and the last one was the largest one which opens the largest area(tuz golu), nature. While I was triying to do that, I made relations in the third main space weakly because jury didn’t like the part and they said work on it more. I will work on it and try to break the view of building.
Burak Ağbulut 